Situation - You are observing the
SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR
also be a VEGAN
Observing the Social Justice Warrior, who is often a Vegan,
can make it easy for you to pick their pattern
The climate discussion in the kitchen is vastly more intense
when you are running out of magnets to put the bills on the fridge.
Here, Elizabeth Hunter™ shares how willing and effective imposition is most difficult with one 'collective' of patterns.
This is the group, initially classified by Plato, as the Idealists.
This is the group, classified by Elizabeth Hunter™, as the Sanctimonious Hypocrites.
If you spot this method, you can go on pick their pattern and impose correctly on them.
Oxor always initially looks at those who are termed the Idealists.
These are (the Intuitive N and Feeling F types)- Persuader (5), Promoter (7), Investigator (10) and Agent (11).
**** This page is all about PEOPLE BEHAVING OFTEN IN A VERY DIFFICULT MANNER
WHICH THEY DO NOT RECOGNISE ****
Warning: Idealists are not SJW's all the time and other behaviour patterns
can exhibit SJW behaviour, but less intensely.
Working DEFINITION: The SJW has Extraverted Feeling (Fe). The typical driver behind the SJW's persuasive powers and modus operandi. They persuade by manifesting an air of nobility about a given standpoint; an air that engages the audience’s feeling function. This implicitly lets the audience know that if a contrary opinion were to be expressed this would disturb the general well-being in the room.
The Developer (2) may show a talent for creating great benefits through addressing social justice issues.
But their dogmatic attitude,
a petulance when confronted by situations that require feelings and a belief that they are always correct in their rational beliefs is a massive clue and warning....
So is the arrogant winner and sore loser persona. Watch for that!
This page shows how, when in Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ mode, how the other person is behaving.
Clients and advanced users know the Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ and they are totally predictable.
A member of the cohort recently asked whether being a part of the Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ is a cult in the sense that cults are involved in brainwashing. . Oxor thinks maybe in a broad sense. e.g. Gay Rights movements are cults. However this group are so brainwashed that their behaviour can sometimes be demonstrated in ways that are disturbingly similar to how people behave in a cult. One definition of 'cult' can be so vague that anyone with strong opinions could be classified as a cult follower. Contrast a religion which is a movement in which people find themselves whereas a cult is a movement in which people lose themselves. A cult often hijacks your identity and makes you into someone you are not. But the Idealists are already there.
Other terms for Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ and Social Justice Warriors are the Offenderati and Wokes. These people are offended by anything and everything. If you challenge, you get cancelled. Arrogance, Ignorance and Incompetence are a lethal cocktail.
Here are some factors that need to be considered:
If an individual is in close proximity to the other person, then the close distance overshadows one’s emotional intelligence and the individual adheres to such ideology as promoted. The individual is so closely and regularly placed that like objects which get close to our vision become blurred and we just accept that it is, so it happens when an individual is closely placed to such extent. It is unfortunate yet very common to see that often the spouse effect on husband or vice versa is a very good example, where proximity is used as a tool and the necessary and unnecessary changes are brought about to cause social impact visible to all in the neighbourhood. e.g. Amway Distributors.
If an individual is living within a community and the community members are mostly elders or power enforcing promoters or advocates, any such order that becomes a social norm then the individual tends to adapt the cult practice or is brainwashed to the thought process and over a reasonable period of intimate following, confirms to it in total. e.g. Not allowing to share a piece of paper around at a meeting at a university due to COVID-19.
Social impact:If an individual is subjected to someone who has already achieved a state of social influence, then too the cult and brainwashing process comes into action. There are many such dismayed people in the society which science either has no solution or very costly solution to, such dismayed people do follow such cults in blind faith where they do not practice any logic as their psychological state has been very exploitive and they are just too eager to pause to see or judge the practical possibility. They just are too desperate to act with apparent wisdom. e.g. Gay movement.
If an individual is subjected to personal charismatic influence, seducing one to conformity with such suaveness that the individual is totally convinced with the personal attention given and becomes a blind follower as one tends to get the shade after a long summer walk in the desert. The cult leaders often enjoy such charming personality that everyone falls trap to the entire process without even giving a serious logical thought to its practical possibility. e.g the Gurus.
If an individual is an addict to some thing or the other and the cult leader facilitates the same and thus gets conformity from the non thinker behaving like sheep, is also a great technique adopted to structure a cult which believes in instilling a new thought and style of living. e.g. the Hippies.
If an individual is antagonized with some personal and social condition and the cult provides an umbrella, without any questioning of its reasonability, on the contrary supports the antagonist, then the follower is ready to be dissuaded to any action appropriate or inappropriate. e.g. Religious practices, Freemasons.
Acknowledgment of Country:
While this action is obviously appropriate, repetitive overuse can be a sign of an Ess Jay Double-Ewe™. Either the person or their organization's stance on items of Social Justice.
The most common cult leaders are Persuader and Promoter. Does the other person appear to have some or all of the following? The delusional martyr; The preacher-turned-egomaniac; The hard-and-fast narcissist.
This page shows the correlation between the Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ who are often Vegans.
A Vegan is a person who, out of respect or compassion for animals, the environment, creation or their own self, has chosen to eliminate animal products including, but not limited to, meat, dairy, eggs, honey, leather and wool from their lives. Often reviled by society, they are a committed group, who put ethics and love before the dictates of their taste buds or tradition. Vegans often cross-identify as radicals, pacifists, hippies and new age spiritualists.
Another definition that we like is someone who slaughters and kills fruit and vegetables.
Clients and advanced users know the Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ and Vegans are totally predictable.
But the Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ and Vegans generally do not realise just how obvious their behaviour is.
When you do see them in action, you can pick them easily and then impose correctly.
Keep a keen eye out for toxic propaganda and idealogical poison. "I am not arguing. I am just explaining why I am right.
You will most likely need assistance :-) This might tell you what but it will not tell you how.
Here is an article no Social Justice Warrior will respect as it contains facts! Click here.
University lectures abandoned October 2021 - an Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ and Wokes Paradise. Oxor™ warned you! Click here.
We are talking here firstly about the Social Justice Warrior.
People that promote and address the social issues that truly matter (civilians) should be widely applauded and acknowledged, but social justice warriors are in a league of their own. They repeatedly bash any content (even if it is innocent) and aggressively call for the downfall of the person who carelessly offended them. They want to apply their politically correct standards and rules to others' speech in an unnecessary or excessive manner. This includes feminism, civil rights, multiculturalism and identity politics. Watch for someone who actively condemns and seeks to harm those who express socio-political views contrary to theirs, while claiming to promote social justice.
Social Activist v. SJW.
"There is not a wheelchair ramp at that building, let's build one."
"Let's persecute those using the stairs and make them feel bad for having legs."
The Ess Jay Double-Ewes™ Method - an Oxor concept:
1. Presents as a Social Justice Warrior (SJW) by taking the moral high ground.
2. Selects 'facts' or 'selective facts' due to their superficial mentality. These 'facts' often turn out to be perception, hearsay, opinion or guess (PHOG, aka 'fog'). But the SJW will always think they are correct in all circumstances as they are more intelligent, more informed and have more rational opinions than the other party; suggesting they are more evolved than everyone else. They seem to be constitutionally incapable of shutting up.
3. Proceeds to detract from many of the real problems by continuing to address and argue about meaningless topics in order to boost themselves in the eyes of their peers. Will get angry whenever given the real facts that hold them to account. They just do not like this!
4. When dealing with SJW's, it is useful to know that a belief is hard to change and a belief can never be wrong. Beliefs are bound up in what a person thinks about themselves (e.g. emotional), their biases and what they think people like them should think. Changing an SJW's belief means having them admit how they defined themselves today needs to change for tomorrow. Micro chance of success here but it is good practice is to introduce doubt around their belief. The SJW is an idealist and reluctant to accept facts that contradict their beliefs. Ask questions correctly. Compare: "Do you believe in climate change?" with "Do you understand climate change?" Watch them struggle!
5. Eventually, the SJW runs out of steam, totally out-gunned with hypocrisy exposed. They will push for the censorship of certain words and arguments just because of the 'offensiveness'. Their strategy is to immediately commence to make their attacks personal. They will marginalise you if you do not conform, except by being a dumb sheep, in doing everything they say and promote. Name calling is a usual attack; e.g. 'you toff', 'you did not attend our protest and / or do what we said', 'you right wing bastard', 'enjoy the COVID-19 inspired food provided by the caterer in small wrapped portions rather than the scones, jam and cream of yesterday' - all form the precursor to defeat.
A favourite fallback is to say "Every little bit helps". That is tantamount to urinating in Sydney Harbour and claiming that the sea level has been affected materially in the English Channel. But the SJW will carry on regardless! Free to be a Jerk? - Article in pdf: Click here.
6. Disappearance is common - never ever agreeing to disagree. Suddenly, the other party just never hears from the SJW. If you want to lubricate this process, to get rid of an Ess Jay Double-Ewe™ based on input from a valuable source, indicate you are a Trump supporter (whether you are or not); the aim is not to discuss politics, it is to get rid of the Ess Jay Double-Ewe™ forever and it works. Another one is to indicate that your friend wants to sell you a 'White Lives Matter' T-Shirt. That is also effective even if you do not wear T-Shirts at all.
7. Opportunities are then taken to assassinate your character. Behind your back, of course. Mutual acquaintances can be a great source of feedback. e.g. Derogatory tone, negative body language, looking at the ground - "I suppose Henry has some sort of use then."
8. Although not mandatory, may be annoyingly politically correct. e.g. 'Helping out with socialisation and behavioural therapy for surrendered animals' means the Ess Jay Double-Ewe™ 'Plays with puppies'; 'Geography' is now 'Earth Science'.
9. Although not mandatory, some sport a hyphenated name. e.g. Audrey Fynes-Clinton; James Barrington-Smythe.
10. Tends to rely on the 'Guvvament' for handouts. Would be there at sparrow fart (for the SJW = 11am) at the Department of Social Affairs and Citizenship, except that it does not exist.
How to effectively provoke an Ess Jay Double-Ewe™: "Does it ever get cold on the moral high ground?"
"What is it like to be on pronoun patrol?"
Spotting a Social Justice Warrior is reasonably easy, look at coverage on the TV of rallies for a bit of fun. Also shown on this page is which drug each type is likely to enjoy, but that is not by any means exclusive and many do not use drugs at all but we hypothesise that some do.
A highly visible variant is the Champagne or Pecksniffian Social Justice Warrior.
Pecksniffian is defined as unctuously hypocritical according to the Merriam Webster Dictionary. False earnestness complimenting behaviour that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel.
The quotation at the foot of this page contains a brilliant example of such behaviour.
Oxor regards the concept of unctiously hypocritical so helpful that it makes discovery of a behaviour pattern easier than it seems should you encounter a Champagne Ess Jay Double-Ewe™ (CSJW™); the Premier Hypocrite™. This is sometimes known in other media as the 'Silver Spoon Socialist'. We have a representative image on the top right of this page. It is annotated to be the Earl Of Asherton, Emeritus the Very Reverend Cardinal Sir Fitzroy Staniforth Jolyon Pork-Belley™, CFW*.
*A person who is not only lacking in clue but is apparently unable or unwilling to acquire clue even when handed it on a plate in generous portions.
The CSJW™, such as Pork-Belley, is the kind of person who gets on your nerves. They believe that they are the only ones who really care about the dolphins/environment/people. And that would be fine if they were actually doing something about it in a genuine, rather than politically correct, manner. But all they seem to do is write self-righteous rants on Facebook, Twitter and in other publications. They are so resentful and easily offended that you have to walk on eggshells around them on a constant basis. They go from being isolated and wrapped up in their own problems to critically tearing down other people and trying to impose guilt trips on them. Moral superiority is the name of the game and they win it on every occasion. So they should be worshiped by the SJW community and door-slammed by everyone else.
Not all folk in the four patterns of Persuader (5), Promoter (7), Investigator (10), and Agent (11) are
a CSJW™. And the CSJW™ is not always in these four, often it can be the Developer (2),
whereas the standard SJW is more likely to be in this four.
But it is likely the CSJW™ fits some, or all, of the following criteria:
- a celebrity, musician, writer, in the arts in some fashion or a politician (commonly).
- nominally espouses the virtues of Socialism and champions the hardships of living a down-to-earth existence among the disenfranchised and down-trodden members of society.
- actually holidays half of the year on plush islands, accept honours from the Queen and rubs shoulders with the affluent over glazed figs topped with mascarpone and wrapped with prosciutto as an hors d'oeuvre.
- generally a bleeding-heart liberal (left / green) on the outside, relishing the reflective glory of the appearance of being sympathetic to the plight of the working man, yet, when they are confronted with genuine poverty and urban degradation, choose to live in tree lined and affluent inner city locations and naturally have a country estate where the smell cannot get to them.
- is attracted to the teaching profession and the SJW incubator of choice - the ubiquitous university.
- a CSJW™ follows the maxim "If you are not a socialist at the age of 20 you have no heart yet if you are not a conservative at the age of 40, you have no brain." However, a true Premier Hypocrite™ is a person who fails to admit their obvious contradiction in the hope that no-one will notice. They went to a $34k per annum+ exclusive private school and are a member of a conservative bastion such as the Australian Club and/or they have reneged on all their radical convictions by becoming rich by adhering to capitalist/conservative principles. They will not share their money unless it involves a tax deduction and/or a building named in their 'honour'.
- carry on as a like minded Premier Hypocrite™ group, observed by Elizabeth Hunter™, that includes an ultra wealthy former QC, a former international businessman and a retired mega firm lawyer. That lawyer cleverly gained benefit, together with his comrades, by selling their tax free office fit out, paid for by the AMP, for a profit of $500,000 and then leasing it back; a tax deduction, comrade.
- behaves like the management of the Australian Football League; yes the billion dollar outfit that does not pay income tax. Take a moment to observe the behaviour of the AFL! Wear your 'White Lives Matter' T-Shirt to a game, if you are game.
An international market leader Champagne Social Justice Warrior would be the former Soviet leader, Leonid Brezhnev, when visiting his mother. He tells her of all the things he now has: the best apartments in the Kremlin, a private limousine which takes him around Moscow and special Party shops that stock goods that no one else has access to. His mother replies: "All that is very fine, Leonid, but what if the Communists come to power and take them away?"
The Co-founder of Greenpeace, an SJW called Paul Watson, said: "It doesn't matter what is true; it only matters what people believe is true."
A new collective noun, created by us, that describes a group of SJWs is an un-germane™ of warriors. Un-germane = being both irrelevant and inappropriate to a situation or occasion.
A term that cries for dignified censorship, but does not receive nor deserve that, describes an individual SJW as someone who "Floats above a cloud of farts". This perfect term was, sadly, not created by Oxor.
Addendum: The SJWs are very poor critical thinkers.
Critical thinking requires the use of ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information. Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value. They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments and findings represent the entire picture and are open to finding that they do not. Critical thinkers will identify, analyse and solve problems systematically rather than by intuition or instinct. See what we mean.
SJWs rely on whose voice is the loudest and whose platform is the biggest. And there will always be a tug-of-war between different groups and factions who want to impose their will on others, much like a bully does at a playground.
The supporters, co-SJWs, of the various groups and factions then tend to rally behind their cause and are extremely vocal about it. To the extent that they are more passionate about the cause than why they are involved in the first place.
We are talking here next about the Vegan.
It is axiomatic that there is a correlation between the Idealists and Vegans.
In the mid 90s a survey resulted in that the most common reason to become a Vegan was concern for animal welfare (63% of vegetarians), with only 37% quoting dietary concerns. One may well ask what these percentages would be if the same questions were asked and if they would have changed back again the day after.
Here are some criteria:
Some of these criteria are different from the Idealists who are often seen as the strident, campaigning vegetarian who does little to impress the sensible carnivore.
1. Can it be the Director - ESTJ?
George W Bush
As the SJW: Directors become politicians.
As the Vegan: Most Unlikely. Likely to be on a raw gluten-free paleo diet, have no fat on their body at all, terrified of chemicals. However, possibly has an eating disorder, may be fat, shames people as if that will make veganism more appealing or something.
Bones of contention / pet issue: You have to pick your battles if you want to make change. Some issues are more important than others.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Cocaine - It increases the Director's efficiency and offers a competitive edge – at least until its highly addictive properties take hold.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of High Handedness and Implementing™
2. Can it be the Developer - ENTJ?
As the SJW: Developers will purchase a politician.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Posts photos of their own muscles next to inspirational quotes about compassion, never eats junk food, works out for 5 hours a day, thinks (wrongly) that they are very sweet and pure.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Becomes a director of a non-profit organisation - that allegedly makes them appear good.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Cocaine - It increases the Developer's efficiency and offers a competitive edge – at least until its highly addictive properties take hold.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Conflict Creation and Exploiting™
3. Can it be the Results - ESTP?
As the SJW: Results folk will break the law.
As the Vegan: Most Unlikely. Constantly promoting this and that brand on Instagram, insists that every vegan food they have ever eaten is the best thing ever, actually does not care about animals or the environment and is just a capitalist.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Lobbies government officials for funding towards social welfare programs.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Cannabis - Results folk turn to weed as a method of calming their over-active senses and chilling out.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Domineering and Selling™
4. Can it be the Inspirational - ENTP?
As the SJW: Inspirationals make people listen to what they have to say by wrapping it in hilarious jokes.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Went vegan as a new year’s resolution and got really into it but gave up after a month.
Bones of contention / pet issue: X seems to be an important issue. [2 weeks later] I’m tired of hearing about it.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Speed - Inspirationals look for a way to defy their physical needs and improve their follow-through on their many excitable ideas – and speed (or amphetamine) provides a shortcut to accomplishing both.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Debating and Discussing™
5. Can it be the Persuader - ENFJ?
As the SJW: Persuaders are often already the head of a church or something and use their affluence to influence. They try so hard to bring about social harmony that they end up catering to everyone's demands and their quest for tolerance becomes intolerance of social integration, which, ironically, is the basis for harmony. And behave as per the method above if their ideas are questioned. There are some Persuaders that genuinely care, but they are often just annoying, nagging, pushy, sappy and ineffective. It seems creating and living some cliché movie moment, "aww'ing", and going through the motions are more important to them than actually addressing/fixing whatever they are screaming about.
As the Vegan: Highly likely. Straight and acts like it, mostly eats quinoa salads, is kind of oblivious, probably feeds their dog a vegan diet.
Bones of contention / pet issue: [speaking into microphone] “…and that is why we need a climate change initiative on this campus.”
Drug of Choice (if a user): MDMA. Persuaders tend to appreciate the social aspect of this drug, which brings everyone out of their shell and allows an already close group of people to feel even closer.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Liking to be Liked and Influencing™
6. Can it be the Appraiser - ESFJ
As the SJW: Appraisers make sure everyone around them knows what is going on in the world.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Does crossfit, wakes up at 5am every day, never not smiling, constantly posting on Instagram, a living stock photo.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Works at a women’s shelter.
Drug of Choice (if a user): MDMA - Appraisers tend to appreciate the social aspect of this drug, which brings everyone out of their shell and allows an already close group of people to feel even closer.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Coaching and Nurturing™
7. Can it be the Promoter - ENFP?
As the SJW: Promoters try to get everyone involved by personally inviting them to join their cause. And behave as per the method above if they are declined. They see themselves as 'inner city' even if they are nowhere near the centre of one. They like areas where there are often social and economic problems which appeal to Promoters such as having a 'Tree Change'. With zero acknowledgment of supply and demand, will extol the virtues of solar power, while leaving the lights on and appliances running when not at home, but will not have such a system, believing the 'Guvvament' should supply one free of charge, although they will say 'for free'.
As the Vegan: Highly likely. Also likely to be a hypocrite. "I'm a vegan! Except yesterday I had yogurt for breakfast. And I do not have a problem with eggs. And I also love fish!"
Bones of contention / pet issue: Gender disparities. Racism. Ableism. Ageism. Poverty. Trans issues. LGBTI issues. So many battles to fight! So little time!
Drug of Choice (if a user): Speed - Promoters look for a way to defy their physical needs and improve their follow-through on their many excitable ideas – and speed (or amphetamine) provides a shortcut to accomplishing both. A graduate of Cannabis.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of The Short Attention Span and Inspiring™
8. Can it be the Counselor - ESFP
Sir Richard Starkey (Ringo Starr)
As the SJW: Counselors go to protests and make art of some sort.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Has been to every vegan restaurant in the country, trying so hard to be trendy, reviews vegan food on their blog, thinks charcoal is edible.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Performs a stand-up routine that makes fun of privileged people in society.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Cannabis - Counselors turn to weed as a method of calming their over-active senses and chilling out.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Fun Times and Befriending™
9. Can it be the Specialist - ISFP
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
As the SJW: Specialists do that really confrontational performance art that usually involves blood.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Although may support ethical treatment of animals, is a white feminist, actually really racist, lies down naked on the streets covered in fake blood for their bizarre art propaganda.
Bones of contention / pet issue: [Graffiti tag with multiple colors] A dark-skinned female’s face dripping with blood-red tears.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) - The Specialist embarks on a short, solo journey that many describe as spiritual, ethereal and life-changing.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Avoidance of Change and Decsribing™
10. Can it be the Investigator - INFJ?
As the SJW: Investigators have eloquent and sometimes vehement / tactless confrontations and are often the first to point out something is wrong with things that are being done.
As the Vegan: Most likely. Amazing cook, often has a huge following on Instagram, knows all the best restaurants to get vegan food that actually tastes good.
Bones of contention / pet issue: “It’s okay if you feel like you don’t belong. You’re not alone.”
Drug of Choice (if a user): Psilocybin Mushrooms - allows the Investigator to disconnect from many of their usual cognitive biases and examine the world through a new lens – which is incredibly attractive to this meditative type.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Independence and Valuing™
11. Can it be the Agent - INFP?
As the SJW: Create powerful pieces of art and literature. And behave as per the method above if the other person is not impressed with their work or views. See themselves as "inner city" even if they are nowhere near the centre of one. Like areas where there are often social and economic problems that appeal to Agents. Extroverted thinking does not allow Agents to clearly see the logic behind their views. They also may completely ignore arguments against their cause because they will not know how to process them in a way that is congruent to maintaining their own belief system.
As the Vegan: Most likely. Spends half of their life in the forest, home cooks everything, only wears organic fair trade cotton, is probably a witch.
Bones of contention / pet issue: [writing in diary] The world is unfair and we need to make it better for everybody.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) - The Agent embarks on a short, solo journey that many describe as spiritual, ethereal and life-changing.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Space Cadetship and Dreaming™
12. Can it be the Achiever - ISTP?
As the SJW: Achievers like to get into heated arguments and go to protests.
As the Vegan: Most Unlikely. Communist, punk, often yelling and getting into arguments, hates privileged ignorant vegans as much as they hate meat eaters.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Builds a ramp for a wheelchair user.
Drug of Choice (if a user): LSD - Achievers enjoy the extreme visual and synesthetic effects.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Work / Life Imbalance and Building™
13. Can it be the Practitioner - ISFJ?
As the SJW: Practitioners will not budge or back down when pressured to be less serious about the stuff they care about.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Wears T-shirts with cartoon cows on them, 90% of their posts are animal videos, absolutely loses it every time they see a puppy.
Bones of contention / pet issue: “Here, I’ll help you find the disability benefits you can apply for.”
Drug of Choice (if a user): Alcohol - traditional and Practitioner retains control.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Apparent Expertise and Supporting™
14. Can it be the Objective Thinker - ISTJ?
As the SJW: Objective Thinkers participate in the political process.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Was briefly a vegan but stopped because they were only in it for health reasons and never got into the political aspects.
Bones of contention / pet issue: Collects statistics and does research on discrimination.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Alcohol - traditional and the OT retains control.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Data and Operating™
15. Can it be the Perfectionist - INTP?
As the SJW: Perfectionists question things that no one else does and are often the “first followers” in movements.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Only eats beans and rice, constantly tired, always reblogging discourse but surprisingly smart, probably broke.
Bones of contention / pet issue: I’m not anti-feminist but I do not like labels like “feminist”.
Drug of Choice (if a user): LSD - Perfectionists tend to enjoy its contemplative nature.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Mad Science, Reasoning and Impracticality™.
16. Can it be the Enhancer - INTJ?
As the SJW: Hard to ever imagine the Enhancer as an SJW. Enhancers may have eloquent and sometimes vehement confrontations and have little or no patience and tolerance of social justice warriors. This can leads to the other party being humiliated, made an example of or permanently removing the Enhancer's name from the Christmas card list, or equivalent. The SJW would have no idea that the Enhancer has already door slammed them.
As the Vegan: Unlikely. Plus no patience for whinging Vegans at the restaurant. Mostly just sits in the basement eating tubs of vegan ice cream (although they could not care whether it was vegan or not), tired of arguing about where they get their protein, probably has a cat.
Bones of contention / pet issue: I can only focus on myself. The rest of society needs to get itself organised.
Drug of Choice (if a user): Psilocybin Mushrooms - allows the Enhancer to disconnect from many of their usual cognitive biases and examine the world through a new lens – which is incredibly attractive to this meditative type.
Archdeacon Moniker™ The Archdeacon of Self-Sufficiency, Patterns and Planning™